The following report posted by The Rules-Keeper, Patricia A. Shaffer, to newsgroup news.admin.net-abuse.email, October 16, 2002*:
Votes having been tallied and certified, these are the Rules of Spam: Rule #0: Spam is theft. Rule #1: Spammers lie. Russell's Admonition: Always assume that there is a measurable chance that the entity you are dealing with is a spammer. Lexical Contradiction: Spammers will redefine any term in order to disguise their abuse of Internet resources. Sharp's Corollary: Spammers attempt to re-define "spamming" as that which they do not do. Finnell's Corollary: Spammers define "remove" as "validate." Rule #2: If a spammer seems to be telling the truth, see Rule #1. Crissman's Corollary: A spammer, when caught, blames his victims. Moore's Corollary: Spammers' lies are seldom questioned by mainstream media.** Rule #3: Spammers are stupid. Angel's Commentary: Spammers think it's okay to steal a little bit from a lot of people. Krueger's Corollary: Spammer lies are really stupid. Pickett's Commentary: Spammer lies are boring. Russell's Corollary: Never underestimate the stupidity of spammers. Spinosa's Corollary: Spammers assume everybody is more stupid than themselves. Spammer's Standard of Discourse: Threats and intimidation trump facts and logic. Rule #4: The natural course of a spamming business is to go bankrupt. Rules-Keeper Shaffer's Refrain: Spammers routinely prove the Rules of Spam are valid.
Blinky Bonus Quote
Blinky would like to add a wonderfully concise example of Rule #3, here. This is the lead of a recent bit of Usenet spam. You do the math:
Ask Yourself 3 Simple Questions 1) Do You Need a New PC or PC UPGRADE ? 2) Would You Like To build Your Own Online ? 3) Do You Want a PC at Trade Price ? 4) Do You Live In The UK ? 5) Would You Like To Purchase Online ?